Look at
college campuses today—trigger warnings, “safe spaces,” speech muzzled, speech
threatened—and one must ask: why? Why
are so many students threatened by a speech? Why are so many campus
conversations today ones that end with a fist? Why are students so eager to
suppress alternative points of view?

One of the brighter scholars addressing these questions is Jonathan Haidt, who teaches at New York University’s business school. He’s a busy man. He’s not just an author, most recently of The Coddling of the American Mind (co-written with Greg Lukianoff). He’s also the creator and organizer of Heterodox Academy, a coalition of people connected with universities in some way (professors, administrators, graduate students) supporting free speech on campus. And he also heads Ethical Systems a group of scholars connected to business schools who are coming up with ways to help business executives deal with ethical questions.

All of Haidt’s
ventures have a common theme, which Brian Gallagher (who is the communications
director for Ethical Systems) explores in a
long interview
in the science magazine Nautilus.

The interview
answers all sorts of questions about Haidt’s thinking and scholarship, but what
seems to tie all of Haidt’s ideas together is this: binary ways of
thinking—left vs. right, Trump vs. Marx, the forces of light versus the forces
of darkness—aren’t accurate ways to view the world. The world, he argues, is
much more complicated than simple binary distinctions make them out to be.

For example,
he notes that the New York Times has
announced a policy where half the letters published in the newspaper will be by
women. But men write three-quarter of the letters to newspapers, in part
because men “like to put themselves out in public and show off” more often than
women do. As a result, he says that the Times’s
policy is unfair and “most Americans think it unfair” because the Times should first look at the ideas in a letter and not the author’s
gender.

Haidt sees
many professors on campus, particularly in what he calls “grievance studies
departments” (which he carefully doesn’t name) as teaching this sort of
dualism—“We’re going to teach you to see men, maleness, masculinity as bad,
everyone else as good. White is bad, everybody else is good. Straight is bad,
everyone else is good.”

“This is Manichaeism,”
Haidt says. “This is our tendency to dualistic thinking.”

Tied in with
this dualism, according to Haidt, are departments in campus administrations
“that have no empirical support,” such as “mandatory diversity training, more
ethnic identity centers, bias response teams so that anybody can report anybody
else anonymously.” While these might sound good to some people, Heidt says, “there’s
no evidence that they’ll make a more inclusive, open, trusting environment.”

“In every bathroom at NYU, there are signs telling students how to report me anonymously if I say something that they find offensive. That means I can’t take chances, I can’t tell jokes, I can’t trust them, even though most of them are great. But if one student in the class takes offense to one thing I say it could mire me in weeks and weeks of bureaucratic difficulty. So I don’t take chances”

But the
dualism Haidt sees in college he also sees in political life. He says he wrote The Righteous Mind (2004) “to help the
Democrats win.” But he found that, as a liberal, reading “the best conservative
writing”—Edmund Burke, Michael Oakeshott, Thomas Sowell—“I realized, ‘Wow, you
actually need to expose yourselves to critics, to people who start from a
different position.”

“So I consider myself a centrist,” Haidt says, “because I am committed to the idea that you have to be listening to both sides.”

“It doesn’t mean that the answer is always in the middle. It’s not. Sometimes the left is correct, sometimes the right is correct. But if you start from an a priori position that our side is right, their side is evil and I’m not going to listen to their arguments, you’re guaranteed to get it wrong.”

What can
philanthropists do to promote this centrism at colleges?

One
organization Haidt likes (and has spoken to) is the SNF Agora Institute, which was founded at
Johns Hopkins with an eight-figure grant from the Stavros Niarchos Foundation. The
institute brings in speakers and has courses, many based on the great classic Greek
and Roman philosophers of antiquity. They apparently have faculty specifically
on their staff, and have hired Yascha Mounk, a moderately renowned political
scientist, to be on their faculty.

But if
students are to be exposed to conservative and libertarian ideas, they need to
have professors on campuses who are recognized as being on the right, who are
treated with respect, and who teach alternative viewpoints.

I recently
attended a
panel
on free speech on college campuses moderated by my fellow Philanthropy Daily contributor
Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Here I thought
Steve Hayward, my long-time friend[1]
and a political scientist at the University of California (Berkeley), made an
important point. Look at conservatives in the humanities and social sciences. Where
are the assistant professors and postdocs who are going to be the rising
conservative voices in history, English, political science, psychology, and
sociology?

They’re not
there for many reasons. First is the Ph.D. glut, a surplus enhanced by the
steady shrinking of humanities departments. But author Zachary Karabell in his
book What’s College For? made another
important point—namely that until a professor gets tenure, she has to do what her
graduate advisors say—and most of those senior professors controlling careers
are leftists. In Karabell’s view, once a professor gets tenure at 45, they’re
usually too burned out to be an independent voice.

So a good
place for funders looking to make a difference in schools is to support
organizations that help young scholars become independent thinkers. The Institute for Humane Studies helps graduate students
and younger professors and has recently reorganized to be more of an academic
organization and less of a think tank. The Intercollegiate
Studies Institute
helps more conservative scholars and provides multiple
graduate fellowships to promising graduate students in the liberal arts.

Give to those two organizations and you’ll be doing your bit to increase intellectual diversity on college campuses.


[1]
Steve Hayward also bought my first book, Angry
Classrooms, Vacant Minds
, which the Pacific Research Institute published.

Share with cohorts